<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindle 2.0: Is It Worth It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Manga News, Reviews and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Henderson</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=492#comment-661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But $10 per title still isn&#039;t cost effective when you can go buy a paperback book for $7-8.  Even if the books are exactly the same price as the paperbacks, you&#039;re still losing money.  The only way it becomes cost effective is if the e-books cost 50% of the cost of the physical book and you buy a LOT of books.  So far, that&#039;s not the case.

The iPod at least always had cheaper than store-bought music to rely on and you could load music you had on your computer into your player.  And frankly, I don&#039;t think the iPod is worth it either, it&#039;s a piece of expensive technology that lets you carry around your entire music collection, but seriously... how much of that can you conceivably listen to in the time you&#039;re out?  It&#039;s an ability that has no real-world application.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But $10 per title still isn&#8217;t cost effective when you can go buy a paperback book for $7-8.  Even if the books are exactly the same price as the paperbacks, you&#8217;re still losing money.  The only way it becomes cost effective is if the e-books cost 50% of the cost of the physical book and you buy a LOT of books.  So far, that&#8217;s not the case.</p>
<p>The iPod at least always had cheaper than store-bought music to rely on and you could load music you had on your computer into your player.  And frankly, I don&#8217;t think the iPod is worth it either, it&#8217;s a piece of expensive technology that lets you carry around your entire music collection, but seriously&#8230; how much of that can you conceivably listen to in the time you&#8217;re out?  It&#8217;s an ability that has no real-world application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Henderson</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=492#comment-660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, there is a lot of substance here.  Finally after nearly 10 years, e-books and readers are getting the attention they deserve.  While the price might not seem justified to the casual reader, the bibliophile will love it.  Especially manga.  With titles $10 a piece and a collector getting about 7-10 a month, the $350 pays for itself fast.

And it&#039;s still early for e-readers.  The iPod when through at least 4 generations before it became a standard consumer product.  Give e-reader hardward makers and publishers time to get the price down and more books out, and the e-reader will become more substance.  Especially for students, who need a product like this more than anyone.  I don&#039;t want our kids having back problems before they&#039;re 20.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, there is a lot of substance here.  Finally after nearly 10 years, e-books and readers are getting the attention they deserve.  While the price might not seem justified to the casual reader, the bibliophile will love it.  Especially manga.  With titles $10 a piece and a collector getting about 7-10 a month, the $350 pays for itself fast.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s still early for e-readers.  The iPod when through at least 4 generations before it became a standard consumer product.  Give e-reader hardward makers and publishers time to get the price down and more books out, and the e-reader will become more substance.  Especially for students, who need a product like this more than anyone.  I don&#8217;t want our kids having back problems before they&#8217;re 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Henderson</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=492#comment-659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still not sold on the viability of the e-book, it seems to be all flash and very little substance.  In my life, at least, carrying around a $300 piece of technology that is no better, functionally, than a $5 paperback, doesn&#039;t make much sense.  I can carry 200 books?  Great, I can only read one at a time, why do I need to cart around 200?  Besides, while I wouldn&#039;t feel all that bad about losing that $5 paperback, I&#039;d be really, really upset at leaving my $350 Kindle behind.

They really need to offer something with an e-book reader that you simply cannot get with a physical book at 1/75th the price.  Until they can do that, they&#039;re not getting my dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not sold on the viability of the e-book, it seems to be all flash and very little substance.  In my life, at least, carrying around a $300 piece of technology that is no better, functionally, than a $5 paperback, doesn&#8217;t make much sense.  I can carry 200 books?  Great, I can only read one at a time, why do I need to cart around 200?  Besides, while I wouldn&#8217;t feel all that bad about losing that $5 paperback, I&#8217;d be really, really upset at leaving my $350 Kindle behind.</p>
<p>They really need to offer something with an e-book reader that you simply cannot get with a physical book at 1/75th the price.  Until they can do that, they&#8217;re not getting my dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Henderson</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=492#comment-658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with wanting to see the whole page of a manga at one time.  I don&#039;t like scrolling either, and tried reading a scanalation on my palm.  It sucked.  If the Kindle views as good as the Tokyopop viewer, I&#039;d be happy.

Even if your friend read manga, there&#039;s next to nothing available, and to get scanalations means hacking (not always a bad thing).

I&#039;m still optimistic about ebooks, and do want an ereader.  I&#039;m leaning toward the Sony though, as it&#039;s more flexible and cheaper.  But it&#039;s the publishers that need to be convinced to make manga available in the format.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with wanting to see the whole page of a manga at one time.  I don&#8217;t like scrolling either, and tried reading a scanalation on my palm.  It sucked.  If the Kindle views as good as the Tokyopop viewer, I&#8217;d be happy.</p>
<p>Even if your friend read manga, there&#8217;s next to nothing available, and to get scanalations means hacking (not always a bad thing).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still optimistic about ebooks, and do want an ereader.  I&#8217;m leaning toward the Sony though, as it&#8217;s more flexible and cheaper.  But it&#8217;s the publishers that need to be convinced to make manga available in the format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Ward</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-20-is-it-worth-it/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=492#comment-657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a xmas party late last year I ran into a friend that has gone gaa gaa over the Kindle.  She has not bought a paper book in 5 months and loves reading stuff off her reader.  The problem I have is reading manga.  I must be able to see an ENTIRE page of manga all at once, not by panel or 75% of a page.  Which is the main reason I do not support scanlations, besides the legality.  Only one manga in the last 5 years have I seen online did not force me to scroll down or to side to see a full page.  Unfortunately my friend does not read much manga, so she could not tell me how the Kindle performed in that compacity.  I am glad Amazon is still supporting this format and hopefully they will one day bring it down in price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a xmas party late last year I ran into a friend that has gone gaa gaa over the Kindle.  She has not bought a paper book in 5 months and loves reading stuff off her reader.  The problem I have is reading manga.  I must be able to see an ENTIRE page of manga all at once, not by panel or 75% of a page.  Which is the main reason I do not support scanlations, besides the legality.  Only one manga in the last 5 years have I seen online did not force me to scroll down or to side to see a full page.  Unfortunately my friend does not read much manga, so she could not tell me how the Kindle performed in that compacity.  I am glad Amazon is still supporting this format and hopefully they will one day bring it down in price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
