<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Manga: 8/8-8/14/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/08/15/this-week-in-manga-88-81409/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/08/15/this-week-in-manga-88-81409/</link>
	<description>Manga News, Reviews and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorena</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2009/08/15/this-week-in-manga-88-81409/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=1968#comment-1082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading through some of the comments on both of the posts you linked to regarding the whole &quot;disclaimer or not&quot; debate on comp copies, I felt like I had to chime in. Since I&#039;ve worked on the other side of the table as a public relations pro, I&#039;ve always felt the need to fully disclose whether or not I got something for free. When I worked for a company that provided comped meals for restaurant reviewers, I always felt that reporters should disclose that. It makes a big difference to readers, especially since you want to know if a professional journalist is getting kick-backs - which is what comps essentially are. Besides, larger newspapers won&#039;t even allow reporters to accept gifts and instead reimburse them for the cost of a meal. Lastly, there is an inherent difference in service between a comp and a obtaining something on your own. One you have to work for to obtain, the other comes to you easily.

And, honestly, I don&#039;t care if I look like an amateur - hopefully, my reviews speak for themselves. Since most of what I review is either something I bought myself or obtained from my local library, I feel compelled to let people know that I receive comp copies from some publishers so that they can judge for themselves whether or not that has colored my review. And, to make it easy for them to spot that difference, should it exist, I even tag those entries. As a PR pro, transparency and ethical behavior is really important to me, especially since, as an industry, we&#039;re judged harshly when we don&#039;t uphold these standards (see anything described as &quot;spin&quot;). Why shouldn&#039;t online journalism - which is what blogging is or trying to be - be held to those same standards?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading through some of the comments on both of the posts you linked to regarding the whole &#8220;disclaimer or not&#8221; debate on comp copies, I felt like I had to chime in. Since I&#8217;ve worked on the other side of the table as a public relations pro, I&#8217;ve always felt the need to fully disclose whether or not I got something for free. When I worked for a company that provided comped meals for restaurant reviewers, I always felt that reporters should disclose that. It makes a big difference to readers, especially since you want to know if a professional journalist is getting kick-backs &#8211; which is what comps essentially are. Besides, larger newspapers won&#8217;t even allow reporters to accept gifts and instead reimburse them for the cost of a meal. Lastly, there is an inherent difference in service between a comp and a obtaining something on your own. One you have to work for to obtain, the other comes to you easily.</p>
<p>And, honestly, I don&#8217;t care if I look like an amateur &#8211; hopefully, my reviews speak for themselves. Since most of what I review is either something I bought myself or obtained from my local library, I feel compelled to let people know that I receive comp copies from some publishers so that they can judge for themselves whether or not that has colored my review. And, to make it easy for them to spot that difference, should it exist, I even tag those entries. As a PR pro, transparency and ethical behavior is really important to me, especially since, as an industry, we&#8217;re judged harshly when we don&#8217;t uphold these standards (see anything described as &#8220;spin&#8221;). Why shouldn&#8217;t online journalism &#8211; which is what blogging is or trying to be &#8211; be held to those same standards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
