<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Friday: Good Idea, Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2010/12/17/tech-friday-good-idea-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2010/12/17/tech-friday-good-idea-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Manga News, Reviews and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anai</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2010/12/17/tech-friday-good-idea-bad-idea/#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Anai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=6672#comment-2145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree Amazon should cede its ability to remove and control works on a user&#039;s own kindle I will make a note about censorship.

If Amazon is alerted as to the potential &quot;obscenity&quot; of a self-published sex fantasy novel it bears legal liability (up to 10 years in prison per work in some states, fines in others) if it does not remove that work. Or at least it would be very difficult to argue in court that it was not aware of the content of the work.

Juries have virtually unbridled discretion to conclude a work is offensive according to local standards, the only saving grace is if the work has serious literary value.

Relying on self-publishers (rather than big publishing houses) to only publish works with serious literary value is a disaster waiting to happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree Amazon should cede its ability to remove and control works on a user&#8217;s own kindle I will make a note about censorship.</p>
<p>If Amazon is alerted as to the potential &#8220;obscenity&#8221; of a self-published sex fantasy novel it bears legal liability (up to 10 years in prison per work in some states, fines in others) if it does not remove that work. Or at least it would be very difficult to argue in court that it was not aware of the content of the work.</p>
<p>Juries have virtually unbridled discretion to conclude a work is offensive according to local standards, the only saving grace is if the work has serious literary value.</p>
<p>Relying on self-publishers (rather than big publishing houses) to only publish works with serious literary value is a disaster waiting to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toastybob</title>
		<link>http://manga.jadedragononline.com/blog/2010/12/17/tech-friday-good-idea-bad-idea/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Toastybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manga.jadedragononline.com/?p=6672#comment-2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, the nook color 2.2 update will not provide access to the android market. It will, however, see the launch of B&amp;N&#039;s own app store.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/nook-color-getting-android-2-2-and-market-in-january-current-ha/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the nook color 2.2 update will not provide access to the android market. It will, however, see the launch of B&amp;N&#8217;s own app store.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/nook-color-getting-android-2-2-and-market-in-january-current-ha/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/nook-color-getting-android-2-2-and-market-in-january-current-ha/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
